Difference between revisions of "Eagle Long Range Fighter Mk 2"
Cholmondely (talk | contribs) (→Links: Added another) |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox ShipStats Frontier| title = Eagle Mk II | {{Infobox ShipStats Frontier| title = Eagle Mk II | ||
| − | |image = | + | |image = [[Image:Eagle2.gif]] |
|ladenmass = 6t | |ladenmass = 6t | ||
|hullmass = 28t | |hullmass = 28t | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| + | the Eagle Mk 2, produced by the Federal Military Research Directorate, was an upgrade to the ubiquitous Mk 1 Long Range Fighter. Although there was much hype at its launch, this was quickly overshadowed by controversy when the extent of the poor design became public. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Controversy == | ||
| + | The Mk 2 involved seven years of design work. The released product was slightly larger and faster with debatably improved looks. However the retro thrusters were poor by even shuttle standards at four gees. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other deficiencies and inadequacies were found quickly. After a Mk 2 imploded on liftoff, killing the pilot, an inquisition was launched into the design. Although no 'smoking guns' were found, the Federal Military Research Directorate never fully recovered from the incident. | ||
| + | |||
== Notable Features == | == Notable Features == | ||
| + | The Mk II remains one of the faster small ships on the market, and has decent capacity for outfitting as a fighter. It's also highly manoeuvrable, making it hard to target in combat. Due to this small size however, it can't take much punishment. | ||
| + | |||
== Disadvantages == | == Disadvantages == | ||
| + | The retro rockets are inexcuscably weak at four gees. Most pilots will forgo the autopilot and do a manual flip at the centrepoint of their journey. | ||
| + | |||
== Verdict == | == Verdict == | ||
| + | A ship for the pilot who enjoys a challenge. Any pilot worth their salt will keep a wide berth. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Links == | ||
| + | * [[Eagle Long Range Fighter Mk 1]] | ||
| + | * [[Eagle Long Range Fighter Mk 3]] | ||
| + | * [[Eagle Mk II]] | ||
| + | * [[Eagle Mk II SE]] | ||
| + | * [[Eagle Long Range Fighter Mk 2 (Oolite)]] | ||
| + | * [[FE2 Ships]] | ||
| + | * [[FFE Ships]] | ||
| − | [[Category:FFE]] | + | [[Category:FE2]][[Category:FFE]] |
Latest revision as of 20:58, 29 December 2020
| Eagle Mk II | |
|---|---|
| |
| Maximum gross mass | 6t |
| Empty mass | 28t |
| Payload | 22t |
| Main thruster accel | 28.2g |
| Retro thruster accel | 4g |
| Gun mountings | 1 |
| Missiles | 2 |
| Crew | 1 |
| Hyperdrive ranges | Class 1:10.71 Class 2:42.85 Class 3:96.42 |
| Standard drive | Class 1 |
| Fuel scoop | no |
Overview
the Eagle Mk 2, produced by the Federal Military Research Directorate, was an upgrade to the ubiquitous Mk 1 Long Range Fighter. Although there was much hype at its launch, this was quickly overshadowed by controversy when the extent of the poor design became public.
Controversy
The Mk 2 involved seven years of design work. The released product was slightly larger and faster with debatably improved looks. However the retro thrusters were poor by even shuttle standards at four gees.
Other deficiencies and inadequacies were found quickly. After a Mk 2 imploded on liftoff, killing the pilot, an inquisition was launched into the design. Although no 'smoking guns' were found, the Federal Military Research Directorate never fully recovered from the incident.
Notable Features
The Mk II remains one of the faster small ships on the market, and has decent capacity for outfitting as a fighter. It's also highly manoeuvrable, making it hard to target in combat. Due to this small size however, it can't take much punishment.
Disadvantages
The retro rockets are inexcuscably weak at four gees. Most pilots will forgo the autopilot and do a manual flip at the centrepoint of their journey.
Verdict
A ship for the pilot who enjoys a challenge. Any pilot worth their salt will keep a wide berth.
