Difference between revisions of "EliteWiki talk:Manual of Style"
(3 different styles of writing "elite" for 3 different contexts) |
m (Added a subtle remark regarding subtleties of context) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Since there is also a third possible meaning within this present context, it is suggested that all references to the ''Elite'' simulator (whether IRL or in-universe, or however else it might be interpreted) should be italicised, and also always written with an initial capital, as the proper brand-name of the simulator. It is recommended that this distinction be applied to all other proper brand-names and their abbreviations as well: ''Frontier: Elite 2'' (''FE2''), ''Frontier: First Encounters'' (''FFE''), ''ArcElite'', ''Elite Plus'', ''Elite -- The New Kind'' (''E-TNK''), ''Oolite'', ''Elite: Dangerous'' (''E:D''), etc. | Since there is also a third possible meaning within this present context, it is suggested that all references to the ''Elite'' simulator (whether IRL or in-universe, or however else it might be interpreted) should be italicised, and also always written with an initial capital, as the proper brand-name of the simulator. It is recommended that this distinction be applied to all other proper brand-names and their abbreviations as well: ''Frontier: Elite 2'' (''FE2''), ''Frontier: First Encounters'' (''FFE''), ''ArcElite'', ''Elite Plus'', ''Elite -- The New Kind'' (''E-TNK''), ''Oolite'', ''Elite: Dangerous'' (''E:D''), etc. | ||
| − | It is recommended that these distinctions be included in the ''Elite'' Wiki's Manual of Style. | + | It is recommended that these distinctions be included in the ''Elite'' Wiki's Manual of Style. It seems as if such distinctions might lend some greater credibility to an author, by indicating that they are actually aware of the subtleties of the various contexts within which they operate. |
--[[User:User2357|User2357]] ([[User talk:User2357|talk]]) 10:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC) | --[[User:User2357|User2357]] ([[User talk:User2357|talk]]) 10:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:30, 10 January 2024
- Shortcut: ET:MOS and EW:MOST redirects here
élite vs. Elite vs. Elite
The first, with the acute diacritic on the first "e", refers to a superior (group of) person(s). This may be written with an initial lower-case "e".
The second, without the acute diacritic on the first "E", refers to the GalCop Combat-Rating, and is always written with at least an initial capital, as defined in the original, 1984 The Space Trader's Flight Training Manual (SBG38/B1), pp. 9 - 10.
Since there is also a third possible meaning within this present context, it is suggested that all references to the Elite simulator (whether IRL or in-universe, or however else it might be interpreted) should be italicised, and also always written with an initial capital, as the proper brand-name of the simulator. It is recommended that this distinction be applied to all other proper brand-names and their abbreviations as well: Frontier: Elite 2 (FE2), Frontier: First Encounters (FFE), ArcElite, Elite Plus, Elite -- The New Kind (E-TNK), Oolite, Elite: Dangerous (E:D), etc.
It is recommended that these distinctions be included in the Elite Wiki's Manual of Style. It seems as if such distinctions might lend some greater credibility to an author, by indicating that they are actually aware of the subtleties of the various contexts within which they operate.
--User2357 (talk) 10:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Ulite Namespace
Hi Folks, I've moved all the Ulite pages to be prefixed with Ulite. I've copied the convention used by this category.... http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php/Category:Oolite_JavaScript_Reference
Since it's fairly obscure stuff, I didn't think it was fair to take titles such as "Documentation" and "Overview". Some of the other pages had (Ulite) at the end of them. --Psylem 14:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Is this supposed to be there?
Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!
lukjad007 Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.
Diederick agrees as well. Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam?
