Talk:Trumbles spoil

From Elite Wiki

I'll leave the *** systemname and insertion of trumble pictures for someone else. :)

Please add if you think of something better.


gal5. Encein TL: 0, anarchy, disgusting, maybe. or Teat, (116,231), TL: 0, Human Colonials, Anarchy, Teat is cursed by dreadful civil war. in gal8. 59. Esenis, (1,39), TL: 1, Human Colonials, Anarchy, This world is a revolting little planet. gal3 0. Anleis, (32,165), TL: 0, Human Colonials, Anarchy, This planet is mildly fabled for its inhabitants' eccentric love for tourists but plagued by a lethal disease. gal5 100. Inqua, (9,197), TL: 1, Human Colonials, Anarchy, This world is a revolting dump. gal6

maybe just select a nice name and script the planet to specs.

--Arexack 23:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


Agh. this had to happen at some time. I was using the trumble link to create a page, and by the time I saved, you had made 2 trumblepages, and shifted away the orginating link. I know I'm slow, but you didn't see I was uploading trumblepics?

--Murgh 00:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but you were doing nothing with them, so I decided to write a stub page, then I got carried away. sorry

What are we gonna do? --Arexack 00:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


doing nothing? I was chosing my words! I even had one more paragraph planned but decided it is bed-time.. I think firmly that the entry should be for Trumble, singular. in the beginning there is one.

--Murgh 00:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


butbut: trumbles rhymes with troubles. >pout<

Maybe we could alter some stuff, like... your company modified trumble out of trumbloids into a less prolific form, thus circumventing the anti-trumblification laws? I placed their origin in galaxy 5, how much contact is there between 5 and 0?

I could even place the date very close to recent time, so rumours about dissaster could just be dribbling in from across the galaxies.

I like my biotechbabble. :)

--Arexack 01:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

you were busy while I was sleeping. I can play along with trumbloids. it's a much better solution that trumblespoil.

--Murgh 08:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)