Difference between revisions of "EliteWiki:Village pump"

From Elite Wiki
m
m (EliteWiki namespace)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
=== EliteWiki namespace ===
 
=== EliteWiki namespace ===
 
Some OXP related pages are using the EliteWiki namespace (e.g. [[EliteWiki:The SunBat Line]]). Move? [[User:Svengali|Svengali]] 09:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 
Some OXP related pages are using the EliteWiki namespace (e.g. [[EliteWiki:The SunBat Line]]). Move? [[User:Svengali|Svengali]] 09:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 
+
:The same applies for the other WIKI related namespaces (e.g. Wikipedia), etc. I also think that the redirects for Oolite, FFE, etc. related pages in that namespace should be removed. Opinions? [[User:Svengali|Svengali]] 18:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
  
 
=== OXPs in Oolite category ===
 
=== OXPs in Oolite category ===

Revision as of 19:00, 3 February 2013

Most of the discussions around the EiliteWiki happen on the Oolite Bulletin Board these days. Feel free to browse these topics.

  • Wiki backup server is available -> [1]
  • Wiki Extension: Semantic MediaWiki -> [2]


Discussions

New topics are best placed on top. If you drop in the discussions here, please sign your message (~~~~).


Dynamic Ship List

Some pages are inserting multiple entries in Dynamic_Ship_List_(Oolite) which renders its sorting functionality useless. Either remove the SMW template from these pages or split in single pages which can be transcluded? Svengali 09:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


EliteWiki namespace

Some OXP related pages are using the EliteWiki namespace (e.g. EliteWiki:The SunBat Line). Move? Svengali 09:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

The same applies for the other WIKI related namespaces (e.g. Wikipedia), etc. I also think that the redirects for Oolite, FFE, etc. related pages in that namespace should be removed. Opinions? Svengali 18:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

OXPs in Oolite category

What is the proposed approach for OXPs - placing them in the Category:Oolite or not? >90% of the OXPs do not push into it. Svengali 21:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


Template mess

We currently have quite a few different templates to place pages in categories. Some are using the the OXP-in-category template, others are simply using the passed parameter. Time to stick with one approach, I'd think. Svengali 21:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

I've also seen that some templates (e.g. HUD-OXP) have been cleared. What should this be? Svengali 14:16, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


Wanted pages

Special:WantedPages contains a lot of requested articles. Some are lurking there for several years. Specially Classic, FFE and FE2 stuff hasn't been touched for ages. Should we go and simply turn the links in plain text? Svengali 21:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)