Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oolite Equipment"
m |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
should we add a link to the OXP-page? | should we add a link to the OXP-page? | ||
--[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 13:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | --[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 13:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | -- OXP Equipment -- | ||
| + | I think it's a fair idea, since equipment is equipment, native or OXP. Just as long as the desciption is linked to the OXP and clearly marked as not native to Oolite. | ||
| + | --[[User:Captain Hesperus|Captain Hesperus]] 12:50 17 November 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 12:51, 17 November 2007
EQ_Trumble is equipment? ;)
There are several pieces of Naval hardware omited, is this intentional or just neglect?
Arexack
They should be included
They need to be included, really (with notes perhaps that they are naval and or expensive). Winston 12:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Categorization
After doing some back-linking to this page I thought about rearranging the category Oolite into Oolite-Ships, Oolite-Equipment, Oolite-Weapons, Oolite-AI, ... . What do you think about this? (I'm not going to change categories on my one) Greetings: Makarius 13:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
-- add OXP equipment? --
should we add it here?
should we add it with a link on the bottom of page to a new category?
should we add a link to the OXP-page?
--Arexack 13:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
-- OXP Equipment --
I think it's a fair idea, since equipment is equipment, native or OXP. Just as long as the desciption is linked to the OXP and clearly marked as not native to Oolite.
--Captain Hesperus 12:50 17 November 2007 (GMT)
