Difference between revisions of "Harrier"
From Elite Wiki
(→Verdict) |
(→Overview: link) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Similar to an [[Asp Explorer|ASP Explorer]] but has 4 Missile pylons instead of 1. | ||
== Notable Features == | == Notable Features == | ||
+ | |||
+ | There really is nothing that makes the Harrier stand out from its rivals. It has good acceleration and manoeuvrability and, provided a small jump drive is installed, a reasonable amount of cargo space. | ||
== Disadvantages == | == Disadvantages == | ||
+ | |||
+ | As with many ships of this ilk, it doesn't do a particularly great job in any field. It should be thought of as a stepping stone to greater things. | ||
== Verdict == | == Verdict == | ||
− | A viable alternative to the | + | A viable alternative to the Asp Explorer. Slightly less extreme thrusters and slightly smaller payload, and so on. |
[[Category:FFE]] | [[Category:FFE]] |
Latest revision as of 12:25, 25 April 2007
Overview
Similar to an ASP Explorer but has 4 Missile pylons instead of 1.
Notable Features
There really is nothing that makes the Harrier stand out from its rivals. It has good acceleration and manoeuvrability and, provided a small jump drive is installed, a reasonable amount of cargo space.
Disadvantages
As with many ships of this ilk, it doesn't do a particularly great job in any field. It should be thought of as a stepping stone to greater things.
Verdict
A viable alternative to the Asp Explorer. Slightly less extreme thrusters and slightly smaller payload, and so on.