Difference between revisions of "EliteWiki talk:Manual of Style"
From Elite Wiki
m (add shortcutnote) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | :''Shortcut: ET:MOS and EW:MOST redirects here''</br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Ulite Namespace == | ||
| + | Hi Folks, I've moved all the Ulite pages to be prefixed with Ulite. I've copied the convention used by this category.... http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php/Category:Oolite_JavaScript_Reference | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since it's fairly obscure stuff, I didn't think it was fair to take titles such as "Documentation" and "Overview". Some of the other pages had (Ulite) at the end of them. --[[User:Psylem|Psylem]] 14:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Is this supposed to be there? == | ||
| + | |||
Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me! | Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me! | ||
[[User:Lukjad007|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written. | [[User:Lukjad007|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written. | ||
| − | Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam? | + | [[User:Diederick|Diederick]] agrees as well. Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam? |
Revision as of 21:15, 26 January 2022
- Shortcut: ET:MOS and EW:MOST redirects here
Ulite Namespace
Hi Folks, I've moved all the Ulite pages to be prefixed with Ulite. I've copied the convention used by this category.... http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php/Category:Oolite_JavaScript_Reference
Since it's fairly obscure stuff, I didn't think it was fair to take titles such as "Documentation" and "Overview". Some of the other pages had (Ulite) at the end of them. --Psylem 14:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Is this supposed to be there?
Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!
lukjad007 Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.
Diederick agrees as well. Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam?
