Category talk:Deletion requests - Revision history

Cholmondely: /* Not to delete */ Added signature

2022-01-26T21:28:07Z

‎Not to delete: Added signature

Cholmondely: Riposte

2022-01-26T21:27:37Z

Riposte

Murgh: adds

2022-01-26T20:27:22Z

adds

Murgh: sm elaborate

2022-01-26T20:24:14Z

sm elaborate

Murgh: add shortcutnote

2022-01-26T20:16:20Z

add shortcutnote

Murgh: moves Mr.C comment, reply

2022-01-26T20:11:06Z

moves Mr.C comment, reply

New page

:''Shortcut: EW:DRT redirects here''

==Not to delete==
I think that most of this stuff should not be deleted at all. Some of it is important from a historical perspective and some of it is important if you want to play Oolite v.1.77 or earlier. Cholmondeley March 2021

:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. OLD[[User:Murgh|MURGH]] [[User talk:Murgh|talk]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 26 January 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. The misnamed categories for instance, can't be used to redirect to proper categories. But others that are just unused but have potential we should consider using (i.e. Category:Retexture OXPs) We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)		:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. The misnamed categories for instance, can't be used to redirect to proper categories. But others that are just unused but have potential we should consider using (i.e. Category:Retexture OXPs) We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

−	Agreed. The ability to undelete rather changes things.	+	Agreed. The ability to undelete rather changes things. Cholmondeley 21:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 26 January 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. The misnamed categories for instance, can't be used to redirect to proper categories. But others that are just unused but have potential we should consider using (i.e. Category:Retexture OXPs) We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)		:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. The misnamed categories for instance, can't be used to redirect to proper categories. But others that are just unused but have potential we should consider using (i.e. Category:Retexture OXPs) We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	Agreed. The ability to undelete rather changes things.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 26 January 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I think that most of this stuff should not be deleted at all. Some of it is important from a historical perspective and some of it is important if you want to play Oolite v.1.77 or earlier. Cholmondeley March 2021		I think that most of this stuff should not be deleted at all. Some of it is important from a historical perspective and some of it is important if you want to play Oolite v.1.77 or earlier. Cholmondeley March 2021

−	:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. The misnamed categories for instance, can't be used to redirect to proper categories. We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)	+	:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. The misnamed categories for instance, can't be used to redirect to proper categories. But others that are just unused but have potential we should consider using (i.e. Category:Retexture OXPs) We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 26 January 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I think that most of this stuff should not be deleted at all. Some of it is important from a historical perspective and some of it is important if you want to play Oolite v.1.77 or earlier. Cholmondeley March 2021		I think that most of this stuff should not be deleted at all. Some of it is important from a historical perspective and some of it is important if you want to play Oolite v.1.77 or earlier. Cholmondeley March 2021

−	:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)	+	:I think in many cases you're right, and unless there is an argument for unnecessary waste of space, there's no need to be drastic. Some pages are mistakes, however, and some namespaces could be cleared for moving the "real" pages there. The misnamed categories for instance, can't be used to redirect to proper categories. We should just take it on a case-by case, and if we regret a delete, we may later undelete. <font size="-6">OLD</font>[[User:Murgh\|<font size="-1">M</font><font size="-3" >URGH</font>]] [[User talk:Murgh\|<font size="-5"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 26 January 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	:''Shortcut: EW:DRT redirects here''</br>	+	:''Shortcut: ET:DR and EW:DRT redirects here''</br>

	==Not to delete==		==Not to delete==