Difference between revisions of "User talk:Spara"
From Elite Wiki
(Follow up question.) |
(→Answer) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC) | : Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : A tricky question. ADCK's Behemoths is from ADCK and Redux version was done by me by cleaning ADCK's mess. I think it should be kept available for archive reasons, but heavily tagged as buggy and non-functional. Linking to GalNavy addition is probably a good idea. | ||
Revision as of 11:48, 24 January 2016
Question
Hi. I saw you blanked the ADCK's Behemoths Redux article. Was there a special reason? Is it perhaps better to delete the page? Debresser 12:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Answer
The content is included into GalNavy Additions oxp.
- Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on ADCK's Behemoths as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the Galactic Navy Additions OXP instead."? Debresser 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- A tricky question. ADCK's Behemoths is from ADCK and Redux version was done by me by cleaning ADCK's mess. I think it should be kept available for archive reasons, but heavily tagged as buggy and non-functional. Linking to GalNavy addition is probably a good idea.
