Difference between revisions of "User talk:RyanHoots"
(move it!) |
(Responded to message about namespace.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
--[[User:RyanHoots|Ryan Hoots]] 16:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:RyanHoots|Ryan Hoots]] 16:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Article Namespace vs User Namespace == | ||
Well, your choice, but that is no reason to have your userpage in the '''article namespace'''. Please move this page to '''user:RyanHoots''' and delete the then-here-autocreated redirect. It's up to you to then fix any broken links.<br> | Well, your choice, but that is no reason to have your userpage in the '''article namespace'''. Please move this page to '''user:RyanHoots''' and delete the then-here-autocreated redirect. It's up to you to then fix any broken links.<br> | ||
Your ''"dislike for the user namespace"'' to me is no valid reason for sneaking your userpage into the article namespace. If I call category:Oolite then that is because I want to find something about Oolite, not about this or that user. Even Aegidian is found at user:Aegidian. well, ... --[[User:Snork|Snork]] 18:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | Your ''"dislike for the user namespace"'' to me is no valid reason for sneaking your userpage into the article namespace. If I call category:Oolite then that is because I want to find something about Oolite, not about this or that user. Even Aegidian is found at user:Aegidian. well, ... --[[User:Snork|Snork]] 18:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I have been thinking about this recently. My main reason for using the article namespace is because my user page is actually my in-game character's page, so I thought it unfitting to have my character's page in the user namespace. So really, this page could be split, one page in the user namespace, and one normal page for the character. Does this sound good? (Sorry about the slow reply, I haven't checked this page for a while) --[[User:RyanHoots|Ryan Hoots]] 18:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:11, 11 January 2012
I've officially abandoned the Oolite BB, so don't look for me there anymore. If you want to get a message to me, leave one here. I'm still going to release OXPs, too. I have a couple of real good ones in progress.
--Ryan Hoots 16:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Article Namespace vs User Namespace
Well, your choice, but that is no reason to have your userpage in the article namespace. Please move this page to user:RyanHoots and delete the then-here-autocreated redirect. It's up to you to then fix any broken links.
Your "dislike for the user namespace" to me is no valid reason for sneaking your userpage into the article namespace. If I call category:Oolite then that is because I want to find something about Oolite, not about this or that user. Even Aegidian is found at user:Aegidian. well, ... --Snork 18:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have been thinking about this recently. My main reason for using the article namespace is because my user page is actually my in-game character's page, so I thought it unfitting to have my character's page in the user namespace. So really, this page could be split, one page in the user namespace, and one normal page for the character. Does this sound good? (Sorry about the slow reply, I haven't checked this page for a while) --Ryan Hoots 18:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
